BLOG
How to close the interincisal diastema after MARPE
10 March 26

How to close the interincisal diastema after MARPE

Once transverse expansion has been achieved in an adult patient treated with MARPE, many clinicians ask the same question: how should the interincisal diastema be closed?

The objective is not simply to approximate the crowns. The key is deciding how to sequence the movement in order to maintain root control, take advantage of posterior anchorage, and avoid unwanted side effects in the anterior segment.

In expansion protocols inspired by the designs described by Dr. Juan Carlos Pérez Varela, particularly those using six micro-screws and solid skeletal anchorage, the posterior segment usually remains highly stable during the initial phase after expansion. This provides a clear biomechanical advantage if the MARPE device remains in place during the initial stage of diastema closure with aligners.

A common mistake: closing the anterior teeth as a block

From a mechanical perspective, closing all anterior teeth simultaneously may appear efficient. However, it reduces individual control and makes root tip management more difficult. When the goal is stable closure, sequencing is more important than speed.

For this reason, diastema closure should be approached as a deliberate sequence rather than a single global movement.

First phase: central incisors

The strategy begins by moving only the central incisors.

This decision follows a clear biomechanical rationale. By isolating the movement, the aligner maintains sufficient distal support, allowing the plastic to function as an active compression and control element. The presence of material distal to the teeth helps stabilize the tooth axis and reduces the tendency toward unwanted tipping.

At this stage, real root control must be programmed. This involves:

  • Designing the movement with the root in mind, not only the crown
  • Adding root control attachments when necessary
  • Including slight strategic intrusion, even if no obvious vertical problem is present

The intrusion is not programmed for aesthetic reasons but for biomechanical stability. Its role is to assist in controlling root tip during mesial displacement and to improve movement predictability.

When the central incisors are closed under these conditions, the space is reduced with greater three dimensional control and with less need for refinements later in treatment.

Second phase: lateral incisors

Once the central incisors have been stabilized, the same pattern is applied to the lateral incisors.

The key is to repeat the same logic rather than improvising new mechanics. Maintaining posterior anchorage thanks to the MARPE remaining in place during this phase allows anterior movement to occur without losing control of the posterior segments.

Closure progresses gradually, with controlled root movement and without turning the anterior segment into a zone of compensations.

Final adjustments and arch coordination

Only when the anterior segment is correctly positioned does it make sense to perform minor adjustments to the canines and coordinate the arches.

This sequence is intentional. It follows a biomechanical logic: first control, then complete closure, and finally coordination.

Why methodology matters more than isolated movements

Closing the interincisal diastema after MARPE should not be treated as a minor detail within digital treatment planning simply because the initial focus is often on maxillary expansion. It is a biomechanically sensitive phase that requires deliberate planning and often generates aesthetic concern for the patient.

Predictable results depend not only on the aligner system but on how movements are sequenced, how anchorage is used, and how root control is programmed throughout the process.

Learn to plan these protocols with the SAS Method

At Smart Aligners Services we focus on exactly these types of clinical protocols. The SAS Method teaches orthodontists how to sequence movements, use available anchorage effectively, and design each treatment phase with root control and predictability in mind.

If you want to learn how to structure these protocols and apply them systematically in your clinical practice, discover how the SAS Method can help you plan aligner treatments with greater confidence and efficiency.

Third molar anchorage for arch development, step by step
3 August 26

Third molar anchorage for arch development, step by step

In severe crowding, the first decision isn’t how to align, it’s where the space is going to come from. Most of the time we move between two options that both carry a cost: expanding, which loses arch depth, or compressing, which proclines the incisors beyond their biological limits. There’s a third route that many cases […]
Saber más
Closing diastemas with aligners without losing incisor torque
27 July 26

Closing diastemas with aligners without losing incisor torque

Closing diastemas with aligners has a trap that shows up almost every time at the same point: once the incisors start retracting, the torque gets lost. The result is a retrusion that closes the space but leaves the incisors tipped palatally, with everything that means for aesthetics and long-term stability. Avoiding it doesn’t take extraordinary […]
Saber más
Closing extraction spaces with reciprocal anchorage, step by step
21 July 26

Closing extraction spaces with reciprocal anchorage, step by step

Closing extraction spaces with aligners is one of the scenarios where improvisation shows the most, and where the lack of a clear protocol shows even more. In Class II or Class III cases requiring full correction, where a direct staging would be complex, the key is sequencing the movement with reciprocal-anchorage logic that lets you […]
Saber más