BLOG
How to avoid interferences in your digitalizations
18 May 26

How to avoid interferences in your digitalizations

Achieving effective distalization in a single aligner package is possible, but it depends almost entirely on having identified and resolved interferences before starting. The most frequent one (and the most commonly overlooked) has to do with the most distal molar.

If that molar represents an interference and no action is taken before digitalizing the rest of the arch, the movement is blocked from the start.

The distal molar: identify it first, then act

The first step is to assess whether the most distal molar represents an interference for the patient’s distalization.

If it does, it must be distalized 1 mm during the first four to five aligners, and that instruction must be communicated explicitly to the technician. This is not an accessory movement: it is the condition that allows the rest of the sequence to work.

Once cleared, the technician is instructed to intrude it 1 mm at maximum velocity. Working at that speed in this phase reduces flexion with the adjacent tooth and makes the intrusion far more predictable.

The final position of the molar is non-negotiable

The CAD designer must be clear that this position, once achieved, is the final treatment position.

This is not a provisional movement or a preparatory phase to be corrected later. If the technician does not understand this, they may plan subsequent movements on that tooth that undo what was achieved in the initial phases.

The right attachment and vertical control

For distalization to express correctly, the molar must carry an optimized attachment for that movement (ideally multiplanar).

And there is a detail that is frequently overlooked: it must be confirmed that no vertical movements exist on the teeth mesial to the molar being worked. Any vertical movement in that zone creates a secondary interference that compromises the outcome of the entire sequence.

An unresolved interference invalidates the entire plan

The most careful digitalization is worthless if the distal molar is blocking the movement from the start.

When the interference is identified, addressed before planning the rest, and the vertical environment of the mesial teeth is controlled, distalization occurs within a single aligner package and without the need for subsequent corrections.

If you want to learn how to anticipate this type of interference and resolve it with your own clinical judgment, you can learn more about it in the SAS Method.

Attachments in clear aligners: what they do and which types matter
14 September 26

Attachments in clear aligners: what they do and which types matter

Clear aligners move teeth with light, continuous forces, but some movements are hard for a smooth plastic tray to achieve on its own. That is where attachments come in: small tooth-coloured composite bumps bonded to the tooth that give the aligner a defined point to push or pull against. Without them, certain movements are slow […]
Saber más
Using a Bolton discrepancy to simplify extraction cases
7 September 26

Using a Bolton discrepancy to simplify extraction cases

In extraction cases, the hard part usually isn’t opening the space, it’s closing it well. And the movement that complicates most is mesialising the posterior segments to bring the canines into Class I. Before committing to that movement, it’s worth reading a figure that often rewrites the whole mechanics: the Bolton discrepancy. The Bolton discrepancy, […]
Saber más
Clear aligner training for orthodontists: what actually moves the needle
12 August 26

Clear aligner training for orthodontists: what actually moves the needle

Most of us learned aligners the hard way: a weekend intro, a stack of tutorials, and then a lot of trial and error on real patients. It works, eventually, but it is slow and it costs refinements. The gap is rarely the software or the brand. It is the biomechanics, and biomechanics is exactly what […]
Saber más